Two valid paths. One honest recommendation.
RISE with SAP and GROW with SAP are both legitimate routes to S/4HANA Cloud. We recommend based on your business profile — not internal convenience — and prove it with a structured two-week Pathway Assessment.
Find your path in two minutes.
Answer seven quick questions and we'll point you to RISE, GROW or a hybrid — then prove it in the two-week Pathway Assessment.
RISE and GROW, compared.
Both editions reach S/4HANA Cloud. The right one depends on scale, customisation, landscape complexity and how you want to run it.
| Aspect | RISE with SAPPrivate Cloud | GROW with SAPPublic Cloud |
|---|---|---|
| Edition | S/4HANA Private Cloud Edition | S/4HANA Public Cloud Edition |
| Best fit | Large enterprises | Mid-market and net-new units |
| Customisation | Deep customisation supported | Limited, fit-to-standard |
| Landscape & integration | Complex SAP / non-SAP landscape | Simpler integration |
| Release cadence | Annual, planned releases | Quarterly updates |
| Typical timeline | 9–18 months typical | 3–9 months typical |
| Cost profile | Higher TCO, fewer constraints | Lower TCO, subscription |
| Operating model | SAP-managed cloud, dedicated tenancy | Pre-configured industry processes |
| Our credential | SAP Gold Partner |
Often the answer is both.
In many landscapes GROW fits greenfield units, RISE fits the established core — and sometimes both are used together across a hybrid landscape. We design for the enterprise you actually run, not a single product line.
Six steps to a defensible decision.
A fixed, two-week engagement that turns the RISE-or-GROW question into an evidence-based decision your board can stand behind.
Process mapping
We map your core end-to-end processes against standard S/4HANA Cloud to see where fit-to-standard holds and where it does not.
Customisation gap
We quantify the gap between your required customisation and what each edition supports without straining the operating model.
Integration complexity
We assess your SAP and non-SAP landscape, interfaces and data flows to gauge integration effort and risk on each path.
TCO modelling
We model total cost of ownership across both editions — subscription, run and change — so the decision is grounded in numbers.
Regulatory constraints
We factor data residency, audit and sector-specific regulatory constraints that can rule a path in or out before design begins.
Evidence-based recommendation
We bring it together into a single, defensible recommendation — RISE, GROW or a hybrid of both — backed by the evidence above.
Decide with evidence
Start the 2-week Pathway Assessment.
Two weeks. One recommendation — RISE, GROW or hybrid — grounded in your processes, your landscape and your numbers.
Prefer email? info@in2itebs.com